Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Stalking the President: Part Two, or Will Obama be able to reach a diplomatic solution to the impasse with Iran in 2010?


In his inaugural address, Obama told Middle Eastern nations, “We’re willing to extend a hand, if you’re willing to unclench your fist.” Obama’s election heralded in a new era of foreign policy and hope for peace in the Middle East. However, skepticism remains, especially when Iran is brought into the equation. Obama has already faced heavy criticism for his softer, more compromising approach to diplomacy. In the face of myriad challenges both abroad and at home, will Obama be able to reach a diplomatic solution to the impasse with Iran? Yes, we can. Or rather, he can.

First and foremost, Obama represents a new age in foreign policy. He is still focused on American leadership, but in a very different way than the Cowboy Diplomacy of the Bush era. He recognizes that force alone only exacerbates hostilities and will never lead to a permanent solution. His policy is to reach across cultural boundaries and recognize that lasting peace can only be founded upon mutual satisfaction. This brand of diplomacy has already brought him many important successes: chairing a United Nations Security Council meeting on the reduction of nuclear stock piles, leading peace talks between Israel and Palestine, and even implementing a new missile defense system in America. These accomplishments, among others, give him momentum in negotiating with Iran.

Furthermore, they bolster foreign support- which is key to success in the modern age. In his book The World is Flat Thomas Friedman discusses political globalization. He explains that politics are no longer limited to state and national levels, but have extended to an international field as well. For a single nation to advance their international interests, they must keep in mind the desires of other powerful countries. Obama understands this. The most important signal demonstrating support is Russia’s recent hint at enforcing economic sanctions against Iran. When Obama entered office, the apparent alliance between Russia and Iran frightened the international community. The fact that Obama has been able to persuade Russian leaders that sanctions are best for global safety and stability is a tremendous success. Beyond this, Iran is already subject to three UN sanctions as a result of their uranium enrichment program. This demonstrates unprecedented international support for a diplomatic solution between the US and Iran. Strong foreign support bodes well for Obama’s success.

Another important factor in reaching a diplomatic solution is demonstrating America’s commitment to and investment in peace. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that America is prepared to revive peace efforts in the Middle East and will follow through until our objectives are accomplished. But actions speak louder than words. Obama recently all but abolished a Bush-era policy that funded Iranian opposition. This has been the single most important action in reaching a middle ground with Iran. It shows that Obama is not interested in inciting a regime change, but simply in doing what is best for America, Iran, and the world as a whole.

Because of his new approach to foreign policy, strong international support, and demonstrations of genuine intentions, Obama is well on his way to reaching a diplomatic solution with Iran.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSGEE5B023C20091201

http://www.thomaslfriedman.com/bookshelf/the-world-is-flat

No comments:

Post a Comment